MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W101293451 · doi:10.4000/nuevomundo.55932

Christoph Rosenmüller, Patrons, Partisans, and Palace Intrigues. The Court Society of Colonial Mexico 1702-1710, Calgary, University of Calgary Press, 2008, 278 p.

2008· article· en· W101293451 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Frédérique Langue

Bibliographic record

VenueNuevo mundo mundos nuevos · 2008
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicHistorical Studies in Latin America
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsColonialismPolitical scienceHistoryGerontologyLawMedicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Aux confins des histoires institutionnelles, du genre biographique ou de la prosopographie désormais plébiscitée par les spécialistes d’histoire sociale novohispana et notamment par les tenants de l’analyse des réseaux sociaux, cet ouvrage rompt cependant avec les récits hagiographiques habituellement proposés à l’endroit des vice-rois. Intrigues de palais et clientélismes sont présentés d’entrée comme les caractéristiques majeures de la période considérée, celle du gouvernement du duc d’Alb...

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: Review
Teacher disagreement score0.238
Threshold uncertainty score0.473

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0040.007
Science and technology studies0.0080.008
Scholarly communication0.0060.009
Open science0.0020.002
Research integrity0.0030.003
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0150.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.019
GPT teacher head0.246
Teacher spread0.227 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreReview

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2008
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueNuevo mundo mundos nuevosSame topicHistorical Studies in Latin AmericaFrench-language works237,207