Bibliographic record
Abstract
Parmi les obligations et les droits des fideles dans le Code de droit canonique de 1983, le canon 220 assure le droit a la protection de la vie privee. Cette provision est une innovation dans le systeme canonique de l'Eglise. Au debut de son etude, l'A. presente une definition de ce droit: la liberte de la personne a determiner quand, comment et jusqu'a quel point il faut sauvegarder ou communiquer l'information qui lui est privee. L'A. examine aussi l'evolution historique du droit a la vie privee dans le droit civil ayant eu un impact sur son developpement canonique. L'A. trace ensuite l'evolution du canon 220 dans la tradition canonique, avec une attention speciale aux developpements du XX e siecle. Avec sa reference a la sauvegarde de la vie privee, le document conciliaire Gaudium et spes 26 fut un tournant important. L'article porte egalement sur l'application pratique de ce droit.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.003 | 0.010 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.008 | 0.017 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.009 | 0.004 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.004 |
| Research integrity | 0.007 | 0.005 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.005 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".