MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W101638416

A quarter century of medicare expenditures for ESRD.

2000· article· en· W101638416 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
P W Eggers

Bibliographic record

VenuePubMed · 2000
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicDialysis and Renal Disease Management
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsEnd stage renal diseasePaymentEntitlement (fair division)MedicineMedicare Part BDialysisQuarter (Canadian coin)DiseaseActuarial scienceBusinessFamily medicineFinanceEconomicsSurgeryInternal medicine
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Medicare's end-stage renal disease (ESRD) program is unique in that it is the only example of an entitlement program based solely on the basis of a clinical condition. Medicare payments on behalf of ESRD beneficiaries is a combination of ESRD-specific payment policies such as those for dialysis, physician oversight, erythropoeitin, and immunosuppression and general Medicare payment policies such as hospital payments, nondialysis physician services, home health, and skilled nursing care. Over the 25-year history of the program, much of the ESRD-related care has been subject to cost controls more stringent than elsewhere in Medicare. Total payments for ESRD beneficiaries continue to consume an ever-increasing percentage of Medicare expenditures, largely because of ever-expanding patient treatment criteria. However, increases in per capita expenditures for ESRD beneficiaries have been far below that of Medicare in general.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.024
Threshold uncertainty score0.080

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0020.003
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0020.001
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0240.006

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.012
GPT teacher head0.235
Teacher spread0.223 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations14
Published2000
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuePubMed→Same topicDialysis and Renal Disease Management→French-language works237,207→