MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1019117462 · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511841453.013

A/D and D/A conversions

2010· book-chapter· en· W1019117462 on OpenAlexaff
Ke-Lin Du, M. N. S. Swamy

Bibliographic record

VenueCambridge University Press eBooks · 2010
Typebook-chapter
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicAnalog and Mixed-Signal Circuit Design
Canadian institutionsConcordia University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsOversamplingQuantization (signal processing)Delta-sigma modulationSuccessive approximation ADCAnalog-to-digital converterDecimationEffective number of bitsNyquist rateAliasingNyquist frequencyNoise shapingComputer scienceSampling (signal processing)Electronic engineeringNoise (video)Nyquist–Shannon sampling theoremAlgorithmBandwidth (computing)UndersamplingArtificial intelligenceElectrical engineeringEngineeringTelecommunicationsCapacitor

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Introduction Analog input signals are converted into digital signals for digital processing and transmission. The analog-to-digital (A/D) converter (ADC) performs this functionality using two steps: the sample-and-hold (S/H) operation, followed by digital quantization. The ADC is primarily characterized by the sampling rate and resolution. A sampling rate of above twice the Nyquist frequency is a must; otherwise, aliasing occurs and the result is not usable. A higher sample rate leads to a more accurate result, but a more complex system. The successive-approximation ADC successively increases the digital code by digitizing the difference until a match is found. The successive-approximation ADC is the most popular type of ADC. The sigma-delta (Σ-Δ) ADC uses oversampling and noise shaping to significantly attenuate the power of quantization noise in the band of interest. The digital-to-analog (D/A) converter (DAC) is used to convert the processed digital signal back to an analog signal by comparing it to the input voltage. This chapter introduces ADCs and DACs that are used in wireless communication systems. Sampling Ideal and natural sampling An analog signal x(t) , bandlimited to f max , can be transformed into digital form by periodically sampling the signal at time nT , where T is the sampling period.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.129
Threshold uncertainty score0.433

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0020.003
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0030.003
Open science0.0020.001
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.1290.096

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.013
GPT teacher head0.158
Teacher spread0.145 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2010
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCambridge University Press eBooksSame topicAnalog and Mixed-Signal Circuit DesignFrench-language works237,207