Bibliographic record
Abstract
本研究以高代回交转育获得的6个不育率和不育度均达100%且遗传稳定的结球甘蓝胞质雄性不育系为材料,通过对orf138与orf222基因的特异扩增发现,所鉴定的24个株系64个单株结球甘蓝CMS植株中59个单株既含有orf138基因,也有orf222基因。两种基因共存的结果暗示,该类CMS可能是ogura和nap两种类型的杂合体。进一步的序列分析结果表明,6个结球甘蓝CMS中所扩增获得的orf138基因与来自萝卜CMS的orf138基因序列完全相同;而除Bo134-2CMS的orf222基因与甘蓝型油菜CMSorf222基因相比对有2个核苷酸差异外,其余5个CMS的orf222基因与甘蓝型油菜napCMSorf222基因的相似性均为100%。其中,Bo134-2CMS的orf222基因第191bp的变异导致第64位氨基酸由精氨酸（R）突变成了赖氨酸（K）。
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".