MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1019455203

结球甘蓝细胞质雄性不育(CMS)类型的分子鉴定

2009· article· zh· W1019455203 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
李建斌, 张海娟, 余小林, 王神云, 曹家树

Bibliographic record

Venue分子植物育种 · 2009
Typearticle
Languagezh
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicPlant Reproductive Biology
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsComputer science
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

本研究以高代回交转育获得的6个不育率和不育度均达100%且遗传稳定的结球甘蓝胞质雄性不育系为材料,通过对orf138与orf222基因的特异扩增发现,所鉴定的24个株系64个单株结球甘蓝CMS植株中59个单株既含有orf138基因,也有orf222基因。两种基因共存的结果暗示,该类CMS可能是ogura和nap两种类型的杂合体。进一步的序列分析结果表明,6个结球甘蓝CMS中所扩增获得的orf138基因与来自萝卜CMS的orf138基因序列完全相同;而除Bo134-2CMS的orf222基因与甘蓝型油菜CMSorf222基因相比对有2个核苷酸差异外,其余5个CMS的orf222基因与甘蓝型油菜napCMSorf222基因的相似性均为100%。其中,Bo134-2CMS的orf222基因第191bp的变异导致第64位氨基酸由精氨酸(R)突变成了赖氨酸(K)。

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.005
Threshold uncertainty score0.018

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0050.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.008
GPT teacher head0.242
Teacher spread0.234 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2009
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venue分子植物育种Same topicPlant Reproductive BiologyFrench-language works237,207