Phylogenetic relationships, systematics, and biology of the species of Amorbia Clemens (Lepidoptera: Tortricidae: Sparganothini)
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The systematics of the New World genus Amorbia Clemens, 1860, is revised. The genus ranges from Brazil through Central America, the Caribbean, Mexico, southeast and western United States and northeastern and southwestern Canada. Greatest species richness is found in middle elevations (500-1500 m) in Central and South America. Twenty-nine species are treated, 13 of which are described as new: A. monteverde (Puntarenas, Costa Rica), A. rhombobasis (Guanacaste, Costa Rica), A. cordobana (Veracruz, Mexico), A. cocori (Puntarenas, Costa Rica), A. cacao (Guanacaste, Costa Rica), A. catarina (Santa Catarina, Brazil), A. dominica (Dominica), A. knudsoni (Texas, U.S.A.), A. potosiana (Nuevo León, Mexico), A. chiapas (Chiapas, Mexico), A. santamaria (Quetzaltenango, Guatemala), A. curitiba (Paraná, Brazil), and A. stenovalvae (Tamaulipas, Mexico). Based on a phylogenetic analysis, five species previously included in Amorbia are excluded and assigned to incertae sedis: “Amorbia” depicta Walsingham, “Amorbia” elaeopetra Meyrick, “Amorbia” leptophracta (Meyrick), “Amorbia” rectilineana (Zeller), and “Amorbia” teratana (Zeller). One species, Amorbia revolutana (Zeller), is raised from synonymy, and three new synonymies are proposed: A. synneurana Barnes & Busck with A. cuneana (Walsingham); A. aequiflexa (Meyrick) with A. productana (Walker); and A. spylocriptis Meyrick with A. revolutana (Zeller). Eight informal species groups are proposed for purposes of discussing character states and their evolution: Curitiba (2 species), Productana (4 species), Humerosana (3 especies), Chiapas (2 species), Colubrana (8 species), Exsectana (1 species), Rectangularis (3 species), and Decerptana (6 species). A redescription of the genus is provided; all the species treated are illustrated (including male and female genitalia where known). Data on localities are listed, and maps showing species distribution are presented. Data on biology is provided for 12 species where inmatures stages are known; host plants for the species are listed. Additionally, a key to the species is provided based on male features.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".