Identification of the soluble granulocyte-macrophage colony stimulating factor receptor protein in vivo
Bibliographic record
Abstract
On the basis of the finding of alternatively spliced mRNAs, the alpha-subunit of the receptor for GM-CSF is thought to exist in both a membrane spanning (tmGMRalpha) and a soluble form (solGMRalpha). However, only limited data has been available to support that the solGMRalpha protein product exists in vivo. We hypothesized that hematopoietic cells bearing tmGMRalpha would have the potential to also produce solGMRalpha. To test this hypothesis we examined media conditioned by candidate cells using functional, biochemical, and immunologic means. Three human leukemic cell lines that express tmGMRalpha (HL60, U937, THP1) were shown to secrete GM-CSF binding activity and a solGMRalpha-specific band by Western blot, whereas a tmGMRalpha-negative cell line (K562) did not. By the same analyses, leukapheresis products collected for autologous and allogeneic stem cell transplants and media conditioned by freshly isolated human neutrophils also contained solGMRalpha. The solGMRalpha protein in vivo displayed the same dissociation constant (Kd = 2-5 nmol) as that of recombinant solGMRalpha. A human solGMRalpha ELISA was developed that confirmed the presence of solGMRalpha in supernatant conditioned by the tmGMRalpha-positive leukemic cell lines, hematopoietic progenitor cells, and neutrophils. Furthermore, the ELISA demonstrated a steady state level of solGMRalpha in normal human plasma (36 +/- 17 pmol) and provided data suggesting that plasma solGMRalpha levels can be elevated in acute myeloid leukemias. (Blood. 2000;95:461-469)
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".