MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1021811661

Estimating Earthquake Risk in Northeast Ohio

2011· dissertation· en· W1021811661 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
B.K. Bennett

Bibliographic record

VenueThe Knowledge Bank (The Ohio State University) · 2011
Typedissertation
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicSeismology and Earthquake Studies
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersU.S. Geological Survey
KeywordsMagnitude (astronomy)SeismologyGeographyGeologyArchaeology
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Other than isolated cases such as Charleston, South Carolina in 1886 and New Madrid in 1911-12, mid-continent earthquakes are not studied as much as plate boundary earthquakes. However, the Ohio Seismic Network monitors earthquakes in Ohio, and a high magnitude earthquake centered in the Northeast Ohio Seismic Zone could cause extensive damage. Maximum expected magnitude, expected depth, and site class for Ohio were studied and compared to results from the 1935 Timiskaming, Canada, 1989 Loma Prieta, California, 2009 L’Aquila, Italy, and 2010 Oaxaca, Mexico earthquakes. Based on the locations of greatest damage resulting from these earthquakes and the surficial geology in Ohio, the Northeast Ohio Seismic Zone is at a high risk area for earthquakes.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.726
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0020.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.016
GPT teacher head0.220
Teacher spread0.204 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2011
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe Knowledge Bank (The Ohio State University)Same topicSeismology and Earthquake StudiesFrench-language works237,207