MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1022174637 · doi:10.5120/21690-4795

SCIDR: A Scalable Cluster based Inter-Domain Routing Protocol for Heterogeneous MANET

2015· article· en· W1022174637 on OpenAlexfundno aff
B Rekha

Bibliographic record

VenueInternational Journal of Computer Applications · 2015
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicMobile Ad Hoc Networks
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersOntario Council on Graduate Studies, Council of Ontario Universities
KeywordsComputer scienceScalabilityComputer networkCluster (spacecraft)Mobile ad hoc networkRouting protocolProtocol (science)Domain (mathematical analysis)Routing (electronic design automation)Distributed computingDatabaseMedicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The area of Mobile Ad-hoc Network (MANET) has already been a topic of attention from past decade among the research community owing to its potential communication advantages as well as issues associated with it.However, the cases of inter-domain routing in the MANET have challenges furthermore compared to conventional MANET system.Border gateway protocol cannot be applied to support interdomain routing in mobile ad-hoc network as it cannot support the dynamic behavior of MANET.Hence, the this paper proposes a novel technique called as SCIDR-Scalable Cluster based Inter-domain Routing that is meant exclusively for heterogeneous MANET system.SCIDR is designed on a totally different principle compared to standard CIDR protocol, where CSI-Channel State Information, as well as channel correlation factor, are introduced to leverage further outcomes.For the first time, extensive performance parameters are used to benchmark the proposed system that ensures effective scalability.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: Methods
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.004

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0020.002
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.030
GPT teacher head0.321
Teacher spread0.292 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2015
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueInternational Journal of Computer ApplicationsSame topicMobile Ad Hoc NetworksFrench-language works237,207