MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W1022325740 · doi:10.1161/str.43.suppl_1.a3694

Abstract 3694: Competing Risk for Long-Term Mortality in Patients with Unruptured Intracranial Aneurysm

2012· article· en· W1022325740 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
James C. Torner, Michael Jones, Diqiong Xie, David G. Piepgras, John Huston, Irene Meissner, Jie Zhang, Robert Brown

Bibliographic record

VenueStroke · 2012
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicIntracranial Aneurysms: Treatment and Complications
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineAneurysmSubarachnoid hemorrhageCause of deathPopulationDeath certificateLife expectancySurgeryNational Death IndexDiseasePediatricsInternal medicineConfidence interval

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Introduction: Mortality in patients with unruptured intracranial aneurysm (UIA) is significantly higher than the general population. However a minority of the deaths are due to subarachnoid hemorrhage. Hypothesis: There are differential characteristics of patients that might predict specific causes of death that would be informative in counseling patients about aneurysm risk. Methods: 4059 patients with UIA who were enrolled prospectively between 1991 and 1998 were followed by 61 medical centers in North America, Canada, and Europe. Patients have at least one UIA, which may or may not be symptomatic. Patients were Rankin grade 1 or 2 at enrollment. Patients were followed annually from enrollment to 2007. For patients who died a death certificate search was done and information was requested from local physicians and other contacts. A National Death Index search in 2008 determined cases who died and cause of death. Foreign centers also did a national search where possible. Patients who died before 30 days post treatment or lost to follow up before 30 days post enrollment were excluded. Results: Twenty-five percent of patients died during follow-up. The life expectancy was significantly less than age-, sex-, and country-matched expected estimates. Among the total of 4004 patients with UIA who survived 30 days after enrollment, 2331 were treated and 1673 were not. There were 965 deaths after 30 days after treatment, of which 320 died from vascular disease (252 died from non-SAH vascular disease), 114 died from respiratory tract disease, 255 died from cancer, and the rest died of other or unknown reasons. Predictors of SAH death were aneurysm size, site, age and convulsive disorders at enrollment. Factors related to vascular death were UIA treatment, age, gender, race, hypertension, Rankin at discharge and diminishing influence of aneurysm characteristics over time. Respiratory deaths were related to treatment, race, smoking, age, initial Rankin and presentation with convulsive disorder. Cancer deaths were related to gender, race, smoking and age. Conclusions: In patients with UIA, an assessment of risk for death underscores the importance of age, race and gender and several modifiable risk factors. Patient management should include not only aneurysm rupture prevention but also modification of smoking and hypertension.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.005
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.011
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.009
Threshold uncertainty score0.029

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0050.011
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0090.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.017
GPT teacher head0.273
Teacher spread0.256 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2012
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueStroke→Same topicIntracranial Aneurysms: Treatment and Complications→French-language works237,207→