MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1023209909 · doi:10.1016/s2212-5671(15)00394-9

Intermediate Manager Behaviors Leading to Employee Job Performance and Well-being: A Conceptual Framework

2015· article· en· W1023209909 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueProcedia Economics and Finance · 2015
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBusiness, Management and Accounting
TopicJob Satisfaction and Organizational Behavior
Canadian institutionsHEC Montréal
Fundersnot available
KeywordsCoachingConceptual frameworkKnowledge managementField (mathematics)PsychologyKey (lock)Focus (optics)Human resource managementPublic relationsBusinessComputer sciencePolitical scienceSociology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Over the past century, the subject of key management behaviors leading to employee job performance and well-being has generated great interest in the scientific and professional community. In the literature, we observe that those decisive managerial behaviors have been the focus of many studies in three major sub-fields: operational management, leadership, and managerial coaching. Although, research in each field have contributed to our understanding of the efficacy of such management behaviors, a comprehensive picture is yet to develop, as they have evolved independently from one another. The purpose of this study is thus to reconciliate these three distinct bodies of literature and to synthesize the main theories underlying, creating an innovative framework to further our understanding of key management behaviors.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.081
Threshold uncertainty score0.646

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.013
GPT teacher head0.219
Teacher spread0.206 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it