MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W102626090 · doi:10.1136/bmj.320.7229.208/e

MP introduces bill to protect children from unlicensed medicines

2000· article· en· W102626090 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Gavin Yamey

Bibliographic record

VenueBMJ · 2000
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicPharmaceutical studies and practices
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsParliamentMedicineAlternative medicineFamily medicineLawPolitical sciencePoliticsPathology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Andrew Love, Labour MP for Edmonton in north London, introduced a bill in the British parliament last week aimed at reducing the risk to children from unlicensed and untested medicines. The bill aims to strengthen the testing and licensing of medicines for children, giving them the same protection as adults afforded by the 1968 Medicines Act. It has all party support and is backed by the Consumers'Association and the Royal College of Nursing. An early day motion supporting the measure and calling for doctors to give more information to parents on drugs prescribed to their children was signed by over 100 MPs. In a recent …

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.003
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.015
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Editorial · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.069
Threshold uncertainty score0.232

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0030.015
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0040.001
Scholarly communication0.0030.003
Open science0.0010.002
Research integrity0.0130.011
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0690.022

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.042
GPT teacher head0.382
Teacher spread0.340 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEditorial

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations3
Published2000
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueBMJSame topicPharmaceutical studies and practicesFrench-language works237,207