The Legend of the "Tributo de las cien doncellas": women as warweavers and the coin of salvation
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Este art?culo estudia la mediaci?n femenina en la leyenda del Tributo de las cien doncellas que narra la etno-re-g?nesis de la naci?n cristiana de Asturias. Seg?n esta leyenda, en el siglo VIH se lleg? al acuerdo de comprar la paz mandando cada a?o cien doncellas a los harenes andalus?es. Este tributo se acaba cuando el rey Ramiro I inicia /a reconquista con la ayuda de Santiago Mata moros. Las cien doncellas de /a leyenda son medianeras en varios sentidos: son las monedas de cambio que compran las relaciones pac?ficas entre los reinos cristia nos y moros; son las madres cristianas de guerreros moros, borrando as? los l?mi tes de las categor?as culturales imaginadas y construidas por la ideolog?a de la reconquista; son mujeres-hombres porque el vergonzoso tributo anual ame naza las categor?as de g?nero; finalmente, son las portavoces de la voluntad divi na, las medianeras de la intervenci?n milagrosa de Santiago que acaba con el tri buto, restaurando la honra cristiana frente a los moros y ala historia en el acto.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.017 | 0.023 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.009 | 0.003 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.004 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.008 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".