MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1026868249

The Legend of the "Tributo de las cien doncellas": women as warweavers and the coin of salvation

2007· article· es· W1026868249 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

venuePublished in a venue whose home country is Canada.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueRevista Canadiense de Estudios Hispánicos · 2007
Typearticle
Languagees
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicArchaeological and Historical Studies
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHumanitiesArtLegendArt history
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Este art?culo estudia la mediaci?n femenina en la leyenda del Tributo de las cien doncellas que narra la etno-re-g?nesis de la naci?n cristiana de Asturias. Seg?n esta leyenda, en el siglo VIH se lleg? al acuerdo de comprar la paz mandando cada a?o cien doncellas a los harenes andalus?es. Este tributo se acaba cuando el rey Ramiro I inicia /a reconquista con la ayuda de Santiago Mata moros. Las cien doncellas de /a leyenda son medianeras en varios sentidos: son las monedas de cambio que compran las relaciones pac?ficas entre los reinos cristia nos y moros; son las madres cristianas de guerreros moros, borrando as? los l?mi tes de las categor?as culturales imaginadas y construidas por la ideolog?a de la reconquista; son mujeres-hombres porque el vergonzoso tributo anual ame naza las categor?as de g?nero; finalmente, son las portavoces de la voluntad divi na, las medianeras de la intervenci?n milagrosa de Santiago que acaba con el tri buto, restaurando la honra cristiana frente a los moros y ala historia en el acto.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesScience and technology studies
Consensus categoriesScience and technology studies
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.969
Threshold uncertainty score0.999

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0020.004
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.012
GPT teacher head0.213
Teacher spread0.201 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it