MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort

Functional variants of the cysteinyl leukotriene 1 and cysteinyl leukotriene 2 receptors are associated with atopic asthma

2012· article· en· W102744241 on OpenAlexaff
Miles D. Thompson, Valérie Capra, Enrico Rovati, Jana Staňková

Bibliographic record

VenueThe FASEB Journal · 2012
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicAsthma and respiratory diseases
Canadian institutionsUniversité de SherbrookeMuscular Dystrophy CanadaUniversity of Toronto
Fundersnot available
KeywordsAtopyAsthmaImmunologyMedicinePhenotypeEtiologyGeneticsGeneBiologyInternal medicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The atopy phenotype is reported to be a risk factor for asthma. Among the many loci that contribute to a genetic predisposition to asthma, the cysteinyl leukotriene receptor 1 (cysLT1) and 2 (cysLT2) genes have been important subjects of study because they are functionally and pharmacologically implicated in the atopy phenotype affecting many asthma subjects. In some populations we have found that the G300S variant of the cysLT1 receptor is associated with atopy. In an earlier association study, the M201V variant of the CysLT2 was implicated in atopic asthma. In this study we identify the statistical association of both the variants with the atopy phenotype. We propose a two hit hypothesis of atopy inheritance that involves the cysLT1 and cyLT2 variants. In vitro analyses are beginning to provide evidence that cysLT1 and cysLT2 interaction within the cell is possible and may represent a mechanism for the etiology of atopy in asthmatic populations.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.004
Threshold uncertainty score0.012

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0040.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.017
GPT teacher head0.223
Teacher spread0.207 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2012
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe FASEB Journal→Same topicAsthma and respiratory diseases→French-language works237,207→