MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1027642634 · doi:10.11575/prism/27938

Supporting Urban Energy Efficiency With A Volunteered Geographic Information (VGI) System: A Calgary Case Study

2014· dissertation· en· W1027642634 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Bilal Abdulkarim

Bibliographic record

VenuePRISM (University of Calgary) · 2014
Typedissertation
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicGeographic Information Systems Studies
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsVolunteered geographic informationGeographic information systemGeographyComputer scienceCartography

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The Heat Energy Assessment Technologies (HEAT) project uses high-resolution airborne thermal imagery, GIS cadastral data, and Geographic Object-Based Image Analysis (GEOBIA) to allow the citizens of Calgary, Alberta, Canada to visualize the amount and location of waste heat leaving their houses, communities, and the city. This information is presented to them in an interactive and multi-scale Geoweb application with three energy efficiency feedback solutions: (i) HEAT Scores, (ii) Hot Spots, and (iii) Estimated Savings – that help residents reduce their greenhouse gas emissions and save their money. To ensure the accuracy of these measures, the correct emissivity of roof materials needs to be known. However, roof material information is not readily available in the Canadian public domain. To overcome this challenge, a new and unique Volunteered Geographic Information (VGI) system was developed using Google Street View and Google Satellite data that engages citizens to classify the roof materials of single dwelling residences in a simple and intuitive manner. Since data credibility, quality, and accuracy are major concerns when using VGI, a private Multiple Listing Services (MLS) dataset was used for cross-verification. Results show that from May-November 2013, 1,244 volunteers from 85 cities and 14 countries classified 1,815 roofs in the study area. Additional analysis reveals (i) a 72% match between the VGI and MLS data, and (ii) in the majority of cases, roofs with greater than, or equal to 5 contributions have the same material defined in both datasets. These results demonstrate that citizens are engaged in correctly classifying the roof materials of houses, and implementing changes to the HEAT VGI system based on feedback from volunteers can further improve data quality and increase participation. Furthermore, to the best of author’s knowledge, this is the first time that Google Street View has been used for classifying roof materials, or has been implemented in the domain of VGI. By building on the lessons learned and the success of this research, we suggest that similar VGI systems may be implemented to create new geo-information in support of urban energy efficiency.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.004
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.409
Threshold uncertainty score0.823

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.004
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.003
Science and technology studies0.0020.002
Scholarly communication0.0020.001
Open science0.0020.002
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.006
GPT teacher head0.218
Teacher spread0.212 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2014
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuePRISM (University of Calgary)Same topicGeographic Information Systems StudiesFrench-language works237,207