MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W102769191 · doi:10.1145/2487788.2487912

Live migration of JavaScript web apps

2013· article· en· W102769191 on OpenAlexaff
James Teng Kin Lo, Eric Wohlstadter, Ali Mesbah

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicMobile and Web Applications
Canadian institutionsUniversity of British Columbia
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHTML5JavaScriptComputer scienceSession (web analytics)Rich Internet applicationWorld Wide WebWeb browserInteroperabilityWeb applicationClient-side scriptingUnobtrusive JavaScriptWeb APIWeb pageOperating systemMultimediaWeb developmentThe Internet

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Due to the increasing complexity of web applications and emerging HTML5 standards, a large amount of runtime state is created and managed in the user's browser. While such complexity is desirable for user experience, it makes it hard for developers to implement mechanisms that provide users ubiquitous access to the data they create during application use. This work showcases Imagen, our implemented platform for browser session migration of JavaScript-based web applications. Session migration is the act of transferring a session between browsers at runtime. Without burden to developers, Imagen allows users to create a snapshot image that captures the runtime state needed to resume the session elsewhere. Our approach works completely in the JavaScript layer and we demonstrate that snapshots can be transferred between different browser vendors and hardware devices. The demo will illustrate our system's performance and interoperability using two HTML5 apps, four different browsers and three different devices.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.004
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.007

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.004
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.002
Open science0.0020.003
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.010
GPT teacher head0.210
Teacher spread0.201 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations5
Published2013
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicMobile and Web ApplicationsFrench-language works237,207