MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort

Ramipril treatment improves vascular endothelial function in db/db mice

2008· article· en· W102799012 on OpenAlexaffabout
Willmann Liang, Calista Yu Rong Tan, James M Wright, Ismail Laher

Bibliographic record

VenueThe FASEB Journal · 2008
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicNitric Oxide and Endothelin Effects
Canadian institutionsUniversity of British Columbia
Fundersnot available
KeywordsRamiprilVasodilationEndothelial dysfunctionMedicineEndotheliumInternal medicineNitric oxideDiabetes mellitusEndocrinologyReactive oxygen speciesType 2 diabetesACE inhibitorPharmacologyAngiotensin-converting enzymeChemistryBlood pressureBiochemistry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Cardiovascular complications are preceded by endothelial dysfunction in type 2 diabetes. This is associated with increased plasma reactive oxygen species (ROS). High ROS levels reduce nitric oxide bioavailability and attenuate vasodilation. The ACE inhibitor ramipril is frequently used in managing the cardiovascular complications of diabetes. We hypothesized that ramipril treatment improves ACh‐induced, endothelium‐dependent vasodilation in db/db mice. We treated 5‐week‐old wild‐type (WT) and type 2 diabetic (db/db) mice with vehicle or ramipril (10mg/kg/day) for 6 weeks. Plasma ROS levels were reduced by ramipril in WT (34%) and db/db (51%) mice. Ramipril treatment increased ACh‐induced vasodilation by 4‐fold in db/db mice without affecting endothelium‐independent vasodilation. These data support a key role for angiotensin II in mediating endothelial dysfunction in diabetes through the generation of ROS. (Supported by Heart and Stroke Foundation of Canada & Singapore Ministry of Education Academic Research Fund)

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.007

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.018
GPT teacher head0.240
Teacher spread0.222 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2008
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe FASEB Journal→Same topicNitric Oxide and Endothelin Effects→French-language works237,207→