MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W10282183

Francisco Umbral's "Lady" Tourists: A fictional View of Early Female Visitors to Spain

2006· article· en· W10282183 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Shelley Godsland

Bibliographic record

VenueRevista Canadiense de Estudios Hispánicos · 2006
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicSpanish Literature and Culture Studies
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsArtHumanities
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

La pol?tica tur?stica del r?gimen franquista logr? el masivo advenimiento a las costas e islas espa?olas del viajero noreuropeo, fen?meno econ?mico que suscit?, asimismo, profundos cambios de toda ?ndole en la sociedad de los a?os 6o en ade lante. Como respuesta al desarrollo de la geograf?a nacional en parque de atrac ciones para la clase obrera de pa?ses de m?s all? del Pirineo, escritores y cineastas dentro de Espa?a concibieron novelas, antolog?as de cuentos y pel?culas que ofre c?an un comentario mordaz del fen?meno tur?stico. Entre estos productos cultu rales figura Las europeas (1970), novela del prolifico y multifac?tico Francisco Umbral que cuenta los amor?os de un joven espa?ol con cinco turistas del norte de Europa. As?, adem?s de rescatar una 'olvidada' novela de Umbral, este art?cu lo propone que el deseo sexual que evidencia el joven narrador espa?ol por los cinco personajes femeninos se hace eco del deseo del hombre espa?ol por apro piarse del poder pol?tico y econ?mico que supuestamente gozaban los ciudadanos noreuropeos. Aseveramos, asimismo, que la textualizaci?n de las protagonistas extranjeras se puede leer como indicaci?n de la dif?cil relaci?n que siempre man tuvo el autor con las mujeres, as? como de la percepci?n umbraliana del desarro llo tur?stico de su pa?s.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.053
Threshold uncertainty score0.106

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0090.007
Scholarly communication0.0090.002
Open science0.0010.004
Research integrity0.0020.003
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0060.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.010
GPT teacher head0.213
Teacher spread0.203 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2006
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueRevista Canadiense de Estudios HispánicosSame topicSpanish Literature and Culture StudiesFrench-language works237,207