Modelling forest fire weather risk in Continental Portugal
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Along with other Southern European countries, Portugal has, each year, enormous damages resulting directly and/or indirectly from forest fire activity, with obvious ecological, financial and social implications. In the last thirty years, more than 3 million hectares of the Portuguese territory have been burnt, placing Portugal on the top-five European Countries most affected by forest fires. Prevention and planning arise as one the most important strategies to minimize the consequences of these hazardous events. To fulfil those goals, information, either to be used by decision makers or for public awareness plays a major role. Thus, the importance of the development and use of different forest fire danger estimation systems is clearly obvious. The Canadian Forest Fire Weather Index System (FWI), developed by the Canadian Forestry Service is based on daily values of temperature, relative humidity, wind at noon and 24-hour accumulated precipitation and is used to estimate the fire risk in Portugal. Advances in computer power in association with state-of-the-art numerical weather prediction models enables increasingly higher resolution weather forecasts, which can be used to replace the initial weather station data dependency, to produce finer detail on local and regional atmospheric circulation patterns, not always possible with a weather station network. The Weather Research and Forecasting model (WRF), via it’s Advanced Research WRF (ARW) core can be used to generate inputs for the estimation of the Canadian Forest Fire Weather Index (FWI). Forecasts (day +1 and day +2 ) of meteorological variables, allows the computation of the FWI system components in each gridpoint of a high resolution domain (3 km), covering the Portuguese territory. Thus, the main objectives of this preliminary study are: 1) to investigate if the WRF-based FWI components can mimic the spatial distribution of area burned, both for an exceptional and average fire seasons; 2) to evaluate if these high-resolution weather forecasts can provide an added-value for forest fire danger estimation and 3) to analyze the potential use of the coupled WRF-FWI system as a tool for producing fire weather risk maps to the community, contributing, thus, for the prevention of wildfires. The WRF model setup, data sources characteristics used for its initialization and the FWI computation scheme are thoroughly described. Results evaluation are based on the comparison of grid-based and station-based FWI and with fire-scars locations, for 2003 and 2009 fire seasons. The 2003 fire season was, both in terms of number of occurrences and area burned, the worst of the last 25 years fire season in Portugal while, on the other hand, 2009 fire season has been considered as an average year in terms of number of fires.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.002 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".