La reducción del tiempo de trabajo y una estrategia ecológica post-crecimiento
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Desde los inicios de la revolucion industrial, los trabajadores y sus aliados han defendido la reduccion del tiempo de trabajo por dos razones fundamentales. Primero, porque ganar tiempo fuera del horario laboral es una via fundamental para mejorar la calidad de vida. Segundo, porque la reduccion de la jornada laboral ha sido considerada una forma de reducir el desempleo mediante la redistribucion del empleo disponible. Con el tiempo, la dificil pero exitosa lucha por la reduccion de la jornada laboral consiguio logros concretos, como las ocho horas diarias, el fin de semana de dos dias, vacaciones pagadas, bajas por maternidad/paternidad y derechos a la jubilacion. Actualmente, a tales motivaciones historicas para una reduccion del tiempo de trabajo empleo y tiempo extralaboral se le ha sumado una nueva razon: la necesidad de reducir el impacto de las sociedades humanas sobre el medio ambiente.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.023 | 0.002 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".