MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1029958129 · doi:10.2753/pin1099-9922120203

The Road to Disclosure Legislation in Canada

2010· article· en· W1029958129 on OpenAlexaffabout
Kelly Saunders, Joanne Thibault

Bibliographic record

VenuePublic Integrity · 2010
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicLegal Education and Practice Innovations
Canadian institutionsUniversity of WinnipegUniversity of ManitobaBrandon University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsCivil servantsLegislationGovernment (linguistics)SafeguardPublic administrationLawPolitical scienceBusinessPolitics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

When the Canadian government unveiled its latest amendments to the Public Servants Disclosure Protection Act (PSDPA) in 2007, it claimed that federal whistleblowers would now have "ironclad protection." Critics maintain that the law amounts to little more than a smokescreen and will do little to encourage civil servants to come forward and to safeguard them from reprisal. This article traces the development of the PSDPA, examines some of the complexities involved with public-sector disclosure, and assesses what this new legislation will mean for federal civil servants in Canada.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.022
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.054
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.660
Threshold uncertainty score0.766

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0220.054
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.002
Bibliometrics0.0040.004
Science and technology studies0.0300.015
Scholarly communication0.0190.006
Open science0.0050.008
Research integrity0.0170.019
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0090.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.039
GPT teacher head0.351
Teacher spread0.311 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2010
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuePublic IntegritySame topicLegal Education and Practice InnovationsFrench-language works237,207