From Picturebook to Film and Film to Picturebook: Crossing Media with Fairy Tales
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The adaptation of literary works to another media is not a new phenomenon.In the case of film, that process is as old as the industry itself.While the reverse process of adapting from the screen to the page is less common, it has become more prevalent in recent years.Intermedial transformation pervades today's multimedia culture.This trend has generated a renewed critical interest in adaptation and an attempt to provide a more solid theoretical framework.In Linda Hutcheon's influential book A Theory of Adaptation, published in 2006, film receives a great deal of attention but children's literature is neglected, as is so often the case in general literary theory.Jack Zipes focuses on film adaptations of major fairy tales such as "Little Red Riding Hood" in his 2010 book The Enchanted Screen: The Unknown Libri & Liberi • 2014 • 3 (1): 11-25The paper focuses on the adaptation of retellings of the story of Little Red Riding Hood from picture book/picturebook to film and film to picturebook.The author considers several revisionings of the popular tale which underwent intermedial transformation in the 1980s, 1990s, and 2000s in Switzerland, France, and Norway respectively.These works demonstrate the range of techniques used over a period of three decades to cross media with fairy tales.Despite the differences in approach, technique, media, and direction of the adaptation, all these recastings of the age-old tale appeal to a crossover audience of children and adults.This is no doubt a reflection of an ever more visuallyoriented society in which age is less of a defining category.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it