MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W103066804 · doi:10.1155/2009/578179

Is H9N2 Avian Influenza Virus a Pandemic Potential?

2009· article· en· W103066804 on OpenAlexaff
Paul Alexander, Prithwish De, Supriya Rave

Bibliographic record

VenueCanadian Journal of Infectious Diseases and Medical Microbiology · 2009
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicInfluenza Virus Research Studies
Canadian institutionsHealth Canada
Fundersnot available
KeywordsInfluenza A virus subtype H5N1OutbreakVirologyBiologyPandemicVirusInfluenza A virusH5N1 genetic structureDiseaseInfectious disease (medical specialty)MedicineCoronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19)

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

To the Editor: H1N1 and H3N2 influenza virus subtypes continue to cause human disease (1,2), while avian influenza A H5 and H7 subtypes spread globally among birds with limited an inefficient transmission to humans (3,4). Results from recent ferret research on the H9N2 subtype has demonstrated an increased theoretical threat to humans from the potential emergence of novel subtypes of avian influenza. In North America, there is no evidence of fixed lineages of the H9N2 avian influenza virus in land-based poultry; it is found in wild ducks and shore birds (5). In contrast, H9N2 remains endemic across Asia, mainly limited to outbreaks in domestic land-based poultry, but overshadowed as a pandemic threat by H5N1 bird flu, which has spread from Asia into Africa and Europe (6–9). However, there is evidence of interspecies transmission of H9N2 from land-based poultry to mammals, such as pigs and swine (10–13). Further evidence of an expanded mammalian host range includes efficient replication of H9N2 in mice without adaptation (14). H9N2 has already caused mild respiratory disease in humans in Hong Kong and mainland China in 1999 and 2003 (10,13,15,16). The six genes encoding the internal components of the H9N2 virus are similar to those found in a previous 1997 outbreak of H5N1 that caused several human deaths in Hong Kong (15). Furthermore, circulating H9N2 strains show human-like receptor specificity with amino acid leucine at position 226 at the receptor-binding site of human airway epithelial cells cultured in vitro (17). H9N2 isolated from live bird markets in Hong Kong possessed receptor specificity similar to human H3N2 viruses (18) and mutations similar to human H2N2 and H3N2 viruses, so the glycoproteins of the Hong Kong H9N2 viruses may potentially promote human infection. In a ferret model of transmission (9), the H9N2 avian reassortment subtype appears to be evolving. The H9N2 virus replicates in the respiratory tract of ferrets and can spread to noninfected ferrets (9). The amino acid leucine residue located at position 226 in the hemagglutinin receptor-binding site (instead of glutamine), plays a key role in human virus-like receptor specificity, and promotes transmission of the H9N2 virus in ferrets. Airborne transmission has not been detected. Mixing the H9N2 viral genes containing the surface glycoprotein and the six internal genes of a human H3N2 virus resulted in increased transmissibility. The model and reassortment mixing results raises concern about viral evolution as well as efficient pandemic transmission, and suggests that the H9N2 avian virus could be of pandemic importance (19). To conclude that H9N2 is the next human pandemic strain is premature at this time given the unfolding evidence. Yet, the possibility for competent nonavian intermediate reassorters generating novel and virulent pandemic strains of H9N2 (or other avain influenza strains) has increased given the recent raccoon influenza transmission findings (20). Additional study and timely surveillance of H9N2 is needed to identify any increments in viral adaptation to human beings. Studies should consider the widespread prevalence of the H9N2 virus in poultry, and co-circulation and mixing of avian H9N2 with human H3N2, H5, H7 and other avian and mammalian viruses.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.004
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.020
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.011
Threshold uncertainty score0.024

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0040.020
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0020.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.002
Scholarly communication0.0030.004
Open science0.0020.001
Research integrity0.0110.011
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0070.004

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.022
GPT teacher head0.319
Teacher spread0.297 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations28
Published2009
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCanadian Journal of Infectious Diseases and Medical MicrobiologySame topicInfluenza Virus Research StudiesFrench-language works237,207