MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1032543784

Фотография как элемент повествования (на материале фотокниги Д. М. Барри «Мальчики, потерпевшие кораблекрушение»)

2009· article· ru· W1032543784 on OpenAlex
Иванкива Марина Владимировна

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueИзвестия Российского государственного педагогического университета им. А. И. Герцена · 2009
Typearticle
Languageru
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicNarrative Theory and Analysis
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsThe ImaginaryCharacter (mathematics)NarrativeElement (criminal law)PhilosophyLiteratureArtEpistemologyAestheticsPsychoanalysisPsychologyMathematicsLawPolitical scienceGeometry
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

J. M. Barrie's photo album, experimental in its nature, is a part of so-called Peter Pan Text. A photo is a combination of facts and fiction; considered as an element or even a substitute for narration, it helps the author to reveal a specific character of imagination as a philosophical category and corresponds to Barrie's ideas on the real and the imaginary.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.007
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies, Scholarly communication, Open science, Research integrity, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies, Research integrity, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.556
Threshold uncertainty score0.998

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0070.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0070.007
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0080.006
Bibliometrics0.0040.004
Science and technology studies0.0090.005
Scholarly communication0.0060.006
Open science0.0070.002
Research integrity0.0030.007
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0740.025

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.021
GPT teacher head0.235
Teacher spread0.215 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it