MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W103339240

Glenn Gould in Concert, 1951-1960

2013· article· en· W103339240 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
David Breckbill

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal - Association for Recorded Sound Collections · 2013
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicMusicology and Musical Analysis
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsContext (archaeology)GermanScholarshipVariety (cybernetics)Visual artsArtAestheticsMedia studiesHistorySociologyComputer scienceLinguisticsPhilosophyLawArtificial intelligencePolitical science
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Gould in Concert, 1951-1960. West Hill Radio Archives WHRA-6038 (6 CDs). This set is self-recommending, even essential, for anyone interested in developing a comprehensive understanding of the artistry of Gould. It contains live or radio performances that have (with few exceptions) never previously circulated on official Sony or CBC releases, and it features a large swath of significant Gould repertory. The accessible, authoritative, and insightful booklet note by Kevin Bazzana, dean of Gould scholarship (French-and German-reading buyers, by contrast, get only the Wikipedia article on Gould in their language), provides a fine overview of Gould's career, at least insofar as that is important for understanding how these particular performances fit into it, and mentions any important ways in which these performances differ from official recordings. Bazzana frankly states that Glenn Gould would have hated this release, and there can be no doubt that the occasional finger slips that can be found here alter to some marginal extent the idealized impression that Gould's commercial recordings create; if one is so inclined, Gould allows one to feel that his recording studio music-making involves pure play of mind released from the constraints of materiality. But the playing to be heard here is nevertheless awesomely impressive from a variety of perspectives, and the combination of these recordings and Bazzana's essay will provide countless hours of enjoyment and stimulation. End of review. How, then, given that Bazzana's essay sheds more specific light on the context and distinctive features of these performances than I could offer here, can I provide additional insights without being utterly redundant? Perhaps the best way will be to back up a step and see these recordings not so much in terms of how they fit into Gould's world as in terms of how the artistry they reveal fits in with piano playing of the 1950s: how, in hindsight, do these performances and Gould's playing in general seem traditional, path-breaking, or (to use words often encountered in evaluating Gould) eccentric or iconoclastic? The mismatch with the style prevalent in his era becomes particularly obvious in certain performances involving orchestra or other performers. There is clearly positive energy going on in Gould's collaborations with Paul Paray and the Detroit Symphony Orchestra--I have never heard a more seamless conclusion to the cadenza in the first movement of Bach's Fifth Brandenburg Concerto, for example, and there is some loving orchestral playing in Beethoven's Second Piano Concerto--but the rapid, tight vibrato in the string playing (especially that of fellow soloist Misha Mishakoff) makes Gould's highly articulated style seem to come from a different planet. On a strictly technical level, the recording balance that emerges in some recordings also seems dated. For example, Gould's playing in this recording of Schoenberg's Das Buch der hangenden Garten sounds recessed and merely fluent next to the plummy, spotlit sound of mezzo-soprano Kerstin Meyer--he would presumably have been given more prominence a decade or two further along, and we would have been the beneficiaries. And it must also be said that there is occasional raggedness from his partners (the horns go astray in the opening tutti of the Brahms First Piano Concerto in this 1959 performance with the Winnipeg Symphony Orchestra). On more fundamental grounds, too, Gould can at times seem to be running against the current. I was especially taken by his treatment of Variation IV in the last movement of Beethoven's Sonata, Op. 109 (an unfortunate misprint in booklet and on box suggests that this piece is in E-flat major rather than the correct E major). Artur Schnabel was one of the first to propose in his Beethoven playing that passages with certain kinds of quick-moving figuration could have unsuspected melodic significance (his position on this soon became extremely influential), and Beethoven's tempo instruction for this variation (etwas langsamer, als das Thema) would seem to make such treatment a real possibility in this passage. …

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: Other
Teacher disagreement score0.118
Threshold uncertainty score0.395

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0020.001
Scholarly communication0.0030.002
Open science0.0000.002
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.1180.042

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.030
GPT teacher head0.243
Teacher spread0.213 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2013
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal - Association for Recorded Sound CollectionsSame topicMusicology and Musical AnalysisFrench-language works237,207