MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1036755186

Axia NetMedia——建设交互网络减小数字鸿沟

2004· article· zh· W1036755186 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
WANG Feng Hui, 周民立

Bibliographic record

Venue信息网络 · 2004
Typearticle
Languagezh
FieldComputer Science
TopicTechnology and Security Systems
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsComputer science
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

加拿大Alberta省的阿尔伯达超级网络(Alberta SuperNet)在今年第一期IEEE Spectrum杂志上被评为将来宽带网络和业务发展的模型。为追踪这个网络的发展历史,本期专栏找到了美国华尔街公司报告(WSCR)2002年6月采访主要建设商Axia NetMedia公司首席执行官Arthur R.Price先生的访谈文章和其它一些相关资料。阿尔伯达超级网络的信息给我们提供的重要启示是:宽带网络的发展在促进社会信息化的同时,也要做到有利于减小社会的数字鸿沟。21世纪的到来,使日本东京一个城市的电话总数超过整个非洲,欧洲芬兰一个国家的电脑主机总数超过拉丁美洲,

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.073
Threshold uncertainty score0.145

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.002
Science and technology studies0.0030.003
Scholarly communication0.0110.006
Open science0.0010.002
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0250.004

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.012
GPT teacher head0.222
Teacher spread0.210 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2004
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venue信息网络Same topicTechnology and Security SystemsFrench-language works237,207