MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1038397721 · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511841453.001

Preface

2010· book-chapter· en· W1038397721 on OpenAlexaff
Ke-Lin Du, M. N. S. Swamy

Bibliographic record

VenueCambridge University Press eBooks · 2010
Typebook-chapter
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicTelecommunications and Broadcasting Technologies
Canadian institutionsConcordia University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsComputer networkWireless WANWireless broadbandMunicipal wireless networkWireless networkWi-Fi arrayFixed wirelessComputer scienceTelecommunicationsWi-FiMobile broadbandPersonal Communications ServiceBroadband networksWirelessBroadband

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In the last three decades, the explosive growth of mobile and wireless communications has radically changed the life of people. Wireless services have migrated from the conventional voice-centric services to data-centric services. The circuit-switched communication network is now being replaced by the all-IP packet-switched network. Mobile communications have also evolved from the first-generation (1G) analog systems to the third-generation (3G) systems now being deployed, and the fourth-generation (4G) systems are now under development and are expected to be available by 2010. The evolution of wireless networking has also taken place rapidly during this period, from low-speed wireless local-area networks (LANs) to broadband wireless LANs, wireless metropolitan area networks (MANs), wireless wide-area networks (WANs), and wireless personal-area networks (PANs). Also, broadband wireless data service has been expanded into broadcasting service, leading to satellite TV broadcasting and wireless regional-area networks (RANs) for digital TV. The data rate has also evolved from the 10 kbits/s voice communications to approximately 1 Gbit/s in the 4G wireless network. In addition, the 4G wireless network will provide ubiquitous communications.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: Other
Teacher disagreement score0.961
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.019
GPT teacher head0.178
Teacher spread0.159 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2010
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCambridge University Press eBooksSame topicTelecommunications and Broadcasting TechnologiesFrench-language works237,207