MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W104064313 · doi:10.5206/cie-eci.v39i3.9164

Multiple Cultures, Multiple Literacies, and Collective Agencies: Chinese and Pakistani Immigrants’ Perceptions of Family Literacy Support

2010· article· en· W104064313 on OpenAlexaffvenueabout
Zheng Zhang, Nazia Bano

Bibliographic record

VenueComparative and International Education · 2010
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicMultilingual Education and Policy
Canadian institutionsWestern University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsLiteracyImmigrationContext (archaeology)SociologyFamily literacyHumanitiesGender studiesPedagogyPolitical scienceGeography

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Challenging the deficit view of immigrant families’ roles in family literacy support, this study is situated in the multiliteracies theoretical framework, which celebrates marginalized, yet diverse, literacy practices in immigrant families. This study used semi-structured interviews and focus group discussions to map diverse family literacy practices in Chinese and Pakistani families. It explores whether and how available educational institutions have been inclusive of immigrant families’ multiple cultures and multiple literacies. Adopting a bottom-up advocacy approach, this study also invites Chinese and Pakistani families to envision family literacy programs by themselves. It brings to light immigrant families’ potential collective agencies in effecting changes to enable more inclusive family literacy programs in the culturally and linguistically diverse context of Canada. Cet article défit la vision négative du rôle des familles d’immigrés dans le support de la littératie familiale. L’étude se situe dans le cadre conceptuel des multi-littératies qui supportent des pratiques de littératie marginalisées mais néanmoins très diverses dans des familles d’immigrés. La méthodologie d’entrevues semi structurées et de groupes de discussions utilisée a permis de décrire les différentes pratiques de littératie adoptées dans des familles chinoises et pakistanaises. Cette étude cherche également à explorer si les institutions éducatives ont pris en compte les différentes cultures et littératies des familles, et dans le cas positif, comment cette prise en compte s’est effectuée. L’analyse vise aussi à inviter les familles chinoises et pakistanaises à créer leurs propres programmes de littératie en utilisant une approche de soutien ascendant. Les résultats montrent un potentiel collectif d’agentivité qui pourrait engendrer la création de plus de programmes de littératie familiaux dans le contexte multiculturel et multilinguistique du Canada.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.596
Threshold uncertainty score0.814

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.067
GPT teacher head0.488
Teacher spread0.421 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations4
Published2010
Admission routes3
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueComparative and International EducationSame topicMultilingual Education and PolicyFrench-language works237,207