MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1041707261

Różnice w poziomie rozwoju poszczególnych stanów USA i krajów UE-25

2007· article· pl· W1041707261 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenuePrace Naukowe Uniwersytetu Ekonomicznego we Wrocławiu · 2007
Typearticle
Languagepl
FieldEconomics, Econometrics and Finance
TopicPolish socio-economic development
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPolitical science
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Two organizations play the main role in international affairs. They are the USA, which together with Canada and Mexico formed North America Free Trade Agreement (NAFTA) in 1994 and the European Union, which had 25 member states in 2004. The European Union has long accepted the fact that there are differences in regions and has tried to reducing regional disparities. Also the USA make efforts to reduce regional disparities. Despite of these, many economic differences still exist between regions. The aim of this article is to show regional disparities in the USA and EU. The article does not compare the European Union with NAFTA but with the United States because this state has a great contribution to the whole functioning of NAFTA.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.009
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies, Scholarly communication, Research integrity, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Research integrity, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.638
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0090.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0030.004
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0040.001
Bibliometrics0.0030.002
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.003
Open science0.0040.002
Research integrity0.0020.003
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0060.035

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.035
GPT teacher head0.254
Teacher spread0.219 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it