У. Л. М. Кинг и развитие канадской либеральной традиции в 20-е гг. Хх в
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The historical-political researches of Western and Russian Canadianist do not mark out 1920s as the period of the swift building of Canadian society. The author believes this period formed the basis of Canadian nation and its further political development on the way of liberal social reforming. In author's mind the development of all sides of life was the basis of further successes in Canada. These years formed the basis of Canadian liberal tradition, which defined the reformist course of M. King's liberal government. The main problem of Canadian nation's unity have been solved successfully by M. King's government and helped continue the holding and the completion of The Second National Policy. The author emphasizes the choiceless of the political leadership in Canada in 1920s. Neither the Conservative party of Canada nor arose the widening progressive movement were not able lead necessary reformist actions at the beginning of century.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.003 | 0.005 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.011 | 0.009 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.004 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.034 | 0.024 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it