MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W104379477 · doi:10.22323/1.028.0006

Measuring Difficult Reaction Rates Involving Radioactive Beams: A New Approach

2010· article· en· W104379477 on OpenAlexaff
M. Lindroos, J.M. D’Auria, Jordi José, L. Buchmann

Bibliographic record

VenueProceedings of International Symposium on Nuclear Astrophysics - Nuclei in the Cosmos - IX — PoS(NIC-IX) · 2010
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicNuclear Physics and Applications
Canadian institutionsSimon Fraser UniversityTRIUMF
Fundersnot available
KeywordsNuclear astrophysicsExplosive materialPhysicsNuclear reactionNuclear physicsRadionuclideNuclear engineeringRadioactive decayAstrophysicsEngineeringChemistry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Rates of sub-barrier, radiative capture reactions involving radioactive reactants, needed for understanding various astrophysical explosive scenarios, are often quite difficult to measure directly at relevant stellar temperatures.In general relatively intense radioactive beams (>10 11 /s) are needed for these inverse kinematic studies, as cross sections are very low.A new production approach is described herein that would supply such required intensities in a relatively straightforward fashion.While this system may have many applications, one area could be increasing our understanding of classical novae and X-ray bursts.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.004
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.005
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: Methods
Teacher disagreement score0.006
Threshold uncertainty score0.021

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0040.005
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0020.002
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0020.001
Bibliometrics0.0060.003
Science and technology studies0.0010.002
Scholarly communication0.0030.005
Open science0.0040.004
Research integrity0.0030.004
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0040.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.016
GPT teacher head0.235
Teacher spread0.220 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2010
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueProceedings of International Symposium on Nuclear Astrophysics - Nuclei in the Cosmos - IX — PoS(NIC-IX)Same topicNuclear Physics and ApplicationsFrench-language works237,207