The Dramatic Presentation of Colonic Lipomata: Report of Two Cases and Review of the Literature
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Colonic lipoma with a dramatic presentation requiring urgent operation is a rare occurrence. We report two such cases in conjunction with a review of the literature on colonic lipomata. Clinicopathologic features of two patients who required urgent resection were studied. The preoperative diagnosis of colonic lipoma was suggested on imaging study in one case. A MEDLINE search was conducted with a special goal of revealing cases with a dramatic presentation. One patient presented with rectal bleeding and intussusception related to a partially infarcted 4.5-cm submucosal lipoma of the lower descending colon. The second patient presented with intestinal obstruction related to a near-totally infarcted 6-cm submucosal lipoma at the splenic flexure. In both cases a florid reactive vascular and fibro-/myofibroblastic proliferation and associated hyperplastic mucosal pattern were present at the base and edge of the lipoma. Among 275 previously reported cases of colonic lipoma 28 patients had a dramatic presentation with pain and/or rectal bleeding being the most significant prodromal symptom. In this subset the lipomas tended to be larger, frequently had associated marked necrosis/ulceration, and were less likely to be located in the ascending colon/cecum. Whereas colonic lipomas are relatively common occasional cases present dramatically with massive bleeding, intussusception, or even perforation for which emergency operation is required. Such lipomas usually reveal marked ischemic changes.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.004 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.004 | 0.003 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.003 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.003 | 0.002 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".