Bibliographic record
Abstract
Le Rituel du grand exorcisme du Rituel romain de 1614 a ete considerablement revise avant d'etre promulgue en 1998, publie en 1999, et reedite avec corrections en 2004. Les normes d'introduction (praenotanda) de ce Rituel constituent la source principale du droit canonique regissant l'exorcisme. La premiere partie de cette etude presente le contexte canonique sur le grand exorcisme du Code de 1917 au Code de 1983. L'A. considere egalement l'implication des professionnels de la sante mentale pour determiner s'il faut proceder a un exorcisme. La deuxieme partie de l'etude examine et analyse les praenotanda du Rituel revise de l'exorcisme. L'A. presente egalement deux documents de la CDF traitant de certains abus lies a des services de prieres, notamment l'utilisation des formules d'exorcisme par des laics et qui ne peuvent etre utilisees que par un pretre nomme a la fonction d'exorciste par l'Ordinaire du lieu.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".