MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W104879511

Bloqueo atrioventricular completo en un perro: tratamiento mediante la implantación de un marcapasos endovenoso permanente

2005· article· es· W104879511 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
A. García, Francisco Ginés Laredo Álvarez, Ángel Pausides Albert Soriano, Amalia Agut Giménez, María Josefa Fernández del Palacio, Juan Berenguer, Miguel del Valle Soto

Bibliographic record

VenueClínica veterinaria de pequeños animales: revista oficial de AVEPA, Asociación Veterinaria Española de Especialistas en Pequeños Animales · 2005
Typearticle
Languagees
FieldMedicine
TopicCardiovascular Conditions and Treatments
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineHumanitiesArt
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Una perra Labrador Retriever presentaba una historia de sincopes, fatiga e intolerancia al ejercicio debida a un bloqueo atrioventricular completo. Debido a que no respondia a la terapia medica (terbutalina, teofilina y posteriormente atropina), fue remitida al Hospital Clinico Veterinario de la Universidad de Murcia con el fin de considerar la implantacion de un marcapasos. Las radiografias de torax mostraron aumento global de la silueta cardiaca y la ecocardiografia puso de manifiesto, ademas, ligera regurgitacion de valvulasatrioventriculares. Se le implanto un marcapasos endovenoso permanente unipolar con modo VVI bajo anestesia general, guiando el cable hacia el ventriculo derecho mediante fluoroscopia con amplificador de imagen. Ocho meses despues de la implantacion, no se han producido complicaciones y el marcapasos funciona segun los parametros programados.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Case report · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.005

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.010
GPT teacher head0.290
Teacher spread0.279 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designCase report
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2005
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueClínica veterinaria de pequeños animales: revista oficial de AVEPA, Asociación Veterinaria Española de Especialistas en Pequeños AnimalesSame topicCardiovascular Conditions and TreatmentsFrench-language works237,207