Simulation de la fonte printanière au bassin des Eaux Volées, forêt Montmorency, Québec
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Les auteurs présentent une étude sur la simulation de la période de fonte de la neige au bassin des Eaux Volées (forêt Montmorency) par le modèle SSARR. Si la reconstitution des débits moyens de la fonte printanière est acceptable, la sous-estimation des débits journaliers de pointe et la fonte rapide des années 1972, 1974, 1976, 1978 et 1980 ont poussé les auteurs à faire l'analyse des composantes hydro-climatiques reliées à ces événements. Cet examen a clairement établi que: 1) dans des conditions de temps relativement dégagé, la méthode de degré-jour utilisée évalue d'une façon acceptable l'écoulement ainsi que les débits de pointe journaliers; 2) Dans des conditions de type de temps cyclonique du sud, les effets combinés de la température et des précipitations accompagnés de flux de chaleur advective transportée par la masse d'air humide expliquent les coefficients de ruissellement élevés, la sous-estimation des débits de pointe et l'apparition des débits extrêmes. L'importance du flux thermique advective a été souligné et discuté.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.003 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".