MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W105450294

A Pragmatic Global Vision System for Educational Robotics

2007· article· en· W105450294 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueNational Conference on Artificial Intelligence · 2007
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicRobotics and Sensor-Based Localization
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Manitoba
Fundersnot available
KeywordsRoboticsArtificial intelligenceComputer scienceMachine visionRobotCognitive neuroscience of visual object recognitionRobot visionObject (grammar)Overhead (engineering)ServerComputer visionHuman–computer interactionMobile robotWorld Wide Web
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This paper advocates the use of global vision as a tool for increasing the effectiveness of robotics education, and describes the design and functionality of advanced global vision systems used in our own programs. Our experiences with using global vision as a basis for teaching robotics and AI have led us to use this as a standard method for teaching undergraduates. Our recent vision systems (DORAEMON and ERGO) have consistently been improved to perform accurately and robustly over a wide range of applications. DORAEMON uses a sophisticated camera calibration method and colour model to remove the need for an overhead view of the world. ERGO minimized the use of colour information to provide more robust object recognition under varying lighting scenarios. Most recently, these video servers have been used by undergraduates to develop autonomous robots for a mixed virtual/physical world.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.985
Threshold uncertainty score0.665

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.058
GPT teacher head0.341
Teacher spread0.283 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it