<i>The Cultural Revolution at the Margins: Chinese Socialism in Crisis</i>, by Yiching Wu
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The Cultural Revolution at the Margins: Chinese Socialism in Crisis, by Yiching Wu. Cambridge, Harvard University Press, 2014. xxii, 335 pp. $US 49.95 (cloth). Yiching Wu offers a revisionist history of the core years of China's Cultural Revolution (1966-69) based on three case studies. At the heart of his study is an investigation of the relevance of class as a category for both historical analysis and understanding social struggles in China today. It provides compelling detail, much of it new, of two well-known cases, the Red Guard debates in 1966 over the blood line theory of revolutionary status (that children of revolutionary cadres were revolutionary by birth while those of reactionary parents--landlords or capitalists--were likewise tainted by their parentage) and the January Storm in Shanghai in early 1967 that saw the toppling of the local government. The third, less-studied case is of the Shenwulian group of rebels in Hunan province in 1968. Wu takes the grassroots view, focusing on local actors rather then central politicians. In this he reflects the current wave of New Party History on the Chinese Communist Party and history of the People's Republic of China that focuses on a social history perspective and relies heavily on archival documents. Wu does this work well, with meticulous use of archives, the chaotic and voluminous Red Guard and other informal publications of the day (now made available in huge reprint and digital editions of hundreds of thousands of pages), new histories and reminiscences, and interviews in China. However, Wu's goal is not simply to let the Chinese subaltern speak. He seeks to understand the role of ideology, and especially to investigate the relationship between the pronouncements of the political centre and thinking on the ground. One of the great strengths of this study is precisely the detailed, grounded, and rigorous investigation of what happened to Mao's vague pronouncements in the mouths and on the streets of Beijing, Shanghai, and Changsha. Wu is committed to embracing the messiness of history but does so in a clear and compelling narrative of bickering student Red Guards, warring Shanghai workers, and resentful Hunanese returnees (urban students who had been sent to villages only to return to the comforts of the city and argue for the right to return). Wu's focus on the role of ideology in general and the concept of class in particular is premised on the conviction that theoretical ideas emerge from a context of pragmatic action rather than contemplatively as disembodied knowledge. Thus, nationally significant issues combine with local contingencies, social rifts, and power relations (p. …
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.004 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.002 | 0.004 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.006 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".