MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

La syndicalisation des travailleurs agricoles migrants au Québec : Du débat en cour au débat de société

2014· article· fr· W10600066 on OpenAlexaffvenueabout
Mathieu Arès, Yanick Noiseux

Bibliographic record

VenueInterventions économiques · 2014
Typearticle
Languagefr
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicSociety, Economy, and Ethics Research
Canadian institutionsUniversité de MontréalUniversité de Sherbrooke
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPolitical scienceHumanitiesEthnologySociologyPhilosophy

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

En avril 2010, la Commission des relations du travail du Québec (CRT) déclarait inconstitutionnelle l’article 21 (5) du Code du travail du Québec et pavait ainsi la voie à l’accréditation syndicale des travailleurs agricoles migrants (210 QCCRT 0191). Le texte poursuit deux objectifs. D’un côté, il s’agit de comprendre les arguments présentésen cour, et de là, mieux saisir la décision de la CTR. D’un autre, il s’agit de s’interroger sur l’impact possible de la décision sur l’organisation et le système de représentation du travail migrant au Québec et au Canada à l’heure de la transnationalisation des marchés du travail et la prolifération, sur le plan national, de programmes de travail migratoire en marge de l’application usuelle des lois du travail.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.007
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesScience and technology studies
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.403
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0070.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.003
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.093
GPT teacher head0.387
Teacher spread0.293 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.

Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2014
Admission routes3
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueInterventions économiquesSame topicSociety, Economy, and Ethics ResearchFrench-language works237,207