MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

A New "Russian Traveler" in Germany: Dostoevsky's Misuse of Karamzin's Cosmopolitan Legacy

2007· article· en· W10617228 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Charles Arndt

Bibliographic record

VenueGermano-Slavica · 2007
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicEastern European Communism and Reforms
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsIntelligentsiaRussian literatureMemoirLiteratureNational identityRussian cultureSensibilityHistoryAllusionGermanIdentity (music)Ancient historyPhilosophyArtPoliticsLawAestheticsPolitical science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

1. Introduction During Dostoevsky's time, as now, Nikolai Mikhailovich Karamzin occupied seminal place in Russian culture. In addition to his reputation as founder of the country's Sentimentalist school and originator of linguistic changes that transformed the language, the historical figure of Karamzin also had profound impact on Russia's sense of national identity. His Pis'ma russkogo puteshestvennika (Letters of Russian Traveler) which appeared in Russia between 1791 and 1801, in the French journal Spectateur du Nord around 1798, and in German translation by Richter in 1800, set up an image of the Russian aristocrat as highly cultured man, who possessed, in the words of Prince Dmitrii Sviatopolk-Mirskii, a new, enlightened, and cosmopolitan sensibility (Mirsky 61). Paradoxically, Karamzin's Istoriia gosudarstva Rossiiskogo (History. of the Russian State, 1818-1825), with its epic panoramas of the country's past, and his Zapiska o drevnei i novoi Rossii (Memoir on Ancient and Modern Russia, 1811), with its insistence on traditional Russian values, also elevated the author to the status of quintessential Russian patriot. Although scholars have traditionally pointed to the influence of Karamzin's literary style on Dostoevsky, the primary reason for the novelist's continuing interest in the great historian and man of letters is none other than his own query into the Russian intelligentsia's sense of self vis-a-vis the West. Following his first trip to Europe in 1862, the novelist experiences an important affinity with Karamzin, viewing himself and the eighteenth-century writer as fellow intellectual travelers, laden with the task of defining the intelligentsia's ideal attitude toward the enormous Western influence on Russia's politics and culture. In Dostoevsky's opinion, Karamzin's paradoxical image as cosmopolitan traveler to Europe on the one hand, and an enthusiastic chronicler of his country's history on the other, qualifies him as kind of balanced model for educated Russians. Indeed, toward the end of his life, the novelist even uses the writer/historian's legacy in an attempt to find common ground between Slavophiles and Westerners, insisting that Karamzin represents those Russian cultural figures of the recent past who were able to combine their Western erudition with an awareness and appreciation for their uniquely Russian identity. 2. Dostoevsky Follows Karamzin's Traveler into Europe: The Manipulation of Karamzin's Germany Dostoevsky's first mention of Karamzin as traveler to the West occurs in 1863, recorded in his own European travelogue under the title Zimnie zametki o letnikh vpechatleniiakh (Winter Notes on Summer Impressions). This is brief but philosophically dense work, which, to use Konstantin Mochulskii's terminology, deals more with the idea of Europe than Europe itself (190). To fully appreciate the points of contact between the two literary figures within the Notes, however, we must briefly describe the latter's relationship to Russian travel-writing of the past. Indeed, with the heavy post-Petrine emphasis placed on imitating the West, the tour of Europe for many educated Russians (certainly by Dostoevsky's time) had become pilgrimage of sorts. The traveler was usually an aristocrat, who from an early age had assimilated so much from Western culture and literature that Europe, to use Iurii Mikhailovich Lotman's and Boris Andreevich Uspenskii's expression, predstavlialas' ne real'no geograficheskim, ideal' nym prostranstvom (appeared not as real geographic, but as an ideal space) (Appendix 563). At the same time, however, the journey to the West allowed educated Russians to take step back, as it were, and evaluate their own country more candidly. Thus, the travel diary, or travelogue as it is sometimes called, played an important role in forming the intelligentsia's sense of national identity: Only by making the prescribed pilgrimage to the West, only by ceasing to regard Europe through the haze of distance as some enchanted land, Joseph Frank opines, could Russian best discover what aspects of European influence in his homeland he might wish to preserve and what discard (233-234). …

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.022
Threshold uncertainty score0.044

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0050.007
Scholarly communication0.0050.002
Open science0.0000.004
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.021
GPT teacher head0.326
Teacher spread0.306 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2007
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueGermano-SlavicaSame topicEastern European Communism and ReformsFrench-language works237,207