Variance in the Meaning of Time by Family Cycle, Period, Social Context, and Ethnicity
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Research that provides a reader with a context for understanding its purpose and results is theory driven research. Without context there is only empiricism (Tindale, 1991a). Theory before design does not mean the two are mutually exclusive. Indeed, in research that is relevant to the user, they are integral to each other. The choice of methodology made by a researcher is (should be) governed by the theory that gives context to the research question asked. Thus, when asking questions about time, the method used needs to be the method best able to illuminate the question in the context in which it was asked. In short, the sense of time is being sought. When individuals become family members through birth, adoption, marriage, or other means, they enter into a context within which the meaning of time is socially constructed. The construction of time is rich in the warp and weave of meaning. Its meaning has developed and been passed on through multiple generations; it is ongoing and there is a sense of anticipating the future. Running across the movement in time over
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".