MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W106406276

EMOTIONS WHILE SHOPPING ON WEB SITES: A RESEARCH PROPOSAL

2010· article· en· W106406276 on OpenAlexaff
Jean Éthier

Bibliographic record

VenueMCIS · 2010
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBusiness, Management and Accounting
TopicConsumer Retail Behavior Studies
Canadian institutionsUniversité de Sherbrooke
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPresentation (obstetrics)PurchasingKey (lock)Empirical researchComputer scienceWeb siteInterface (matter)The InternetWorld Wide WebPsychologyMarketingBusinessComputer security
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This paper describes a research project that aims to increase our understanding of shoppers’ emotions during online shopping episodes. The research project centers on the presentation of a new research model, considered as an expansion of the model presented in Ethier et al.’s (2008) empirical study on the impact of interface design on emotions experienced on B2C Web sites. The model focuses on the impact of several e-shoppers’ emotions on a key purchasing behavior and on the antecedents of these emotions. A proposed methodology to validate the new research model is also presented.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.007
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.008
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Protocol · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.011
Threshold uncertainty score0.040

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0070.008
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0030.004
Science and technology studies0.0030.010
Scholarly communication0.0110.016
Open science0.0030.004
Research integrity0.0040.005
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0050.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.126
GPT teacher head0.344
Teacher spread0.218 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreProtocol

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2010
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueMCISSame topicConsumer Retail Behavior StudiesFrench-language works237,207