Adventures in the Picturesque: Voyage and Voyeurism in the Tourist Guidebook to Mexico
Bibliographic record
Abstract
En este art?culo se propone hacer un an?lisis de la gu?a tur?stica de los siglos xix y xx en su papel de mediador entre M?xico y el viajero; primero como una herra mienta del impulso pintoresco y m?s tarde como un instrumento del r?gimen esc?pico que propusiera Freud en su hip?tesis sobre el voyeurismo. La gu?a tur?stica facilita el encuentro yo/otro mediante t?cnicas enumerativas, discursivas y cartogr?ficas; enmarca vistas y traza itinerarios entre una serie de ampliadas. Seg?n Michel de Certeau, la textualizaci?n de una realidad ajena permite una lectura racionalizada no disponible a sus propios habitantes. El turista anhela la autenticidad, por lo cual experimenta una tensi?n al conformarse con el texto cartogr?fico. Al fin y al cabo la gu?a tur?stica permite una sustituci?n del sujeto por el objeto, descubriendo m?s bien las preocupaciones de la cultura observadora que las singularidades de la cultura observada.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.007 | 0.002 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.003 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.033 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".