MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W106556758

Adventures in the Picturesque: Voyage and Voyeurism in the Tourist Guidebook to Mexico

2002· article· en· W106556758 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

venuePublished in a venue whose home country is Canada.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueRevista Canadiense de Estudios Hispánicos · 2002
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicLiterary and Cultural Studies
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHumanitiesVoyeurismArtPhilosophy
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

En este art?culo se propone hacer un an?lisis de la gu?a tur?stica de los siglos xix y xx en su papel de mediador entre M?xico y el viajero; primero como una herra mienta del impulso pintoresco y m?s tarde como un instrumento del r?gimen esc?pico que propusiera Freud en su hip?tesis sobre el voyeurismo. La gu?a tur?stica facilita el encuentro yo/otro mediante t?cnicas enumerativas, discursivas y cartogr?ficas; enmarca vistas y traza itinerarios entre una serie de ampliadas. Seg?n Michel de Certeau, la textualizaci?n de una realidad ajena permite una lectura racionalizada no disponible a sus propios habitantes. El turista anhela la autenticidad, por lo cual experimenta una tensi?n al conformarse con el texto cartogr?fico. Al fin y al cabo la gu?a tur?stica permite una sustituci?n del sujeto por el objeto, descubriendo m?s bien las preocupaciones de la cultura observadora que las singularidades de la cultura observada.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.731
Threshold uncertainty score0.907

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.020
GPT teacher head0.264
Teacher spread0.244 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it