MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W106920541

Determination of flunixin residues in bovine muscle tissue by liquid chromatography with UV detection.

2001· article· en· W106920541 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.
aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.

Bibliographic record

VenuePubMed · 2001
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldChemistry
TopicSynthesis and Biological Evaluation
Canadian institutionsCanadian Food Inspection Agency
Fundersnot available
KeywordsChromatographyDetection limitChemistryElutionResidue (chemistry)CartridgeHexaneSolid phase extractionHigh-performance liquid chromatographyExtraction (chemistry)Muscle tissueAcetonitrileBiochemistryMaterials science
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

A new and sensitive liquid chromatography-ultra violet method with a detection limit of 6 ng/g (ppb) and a limit of quantification of 15 ng/g was developed for the determination of flunixin residues in bovine muscle tissue. Flunixin in homogenized animal tissue was extracted with acetonitrile after enzyme digestion. The tissue digest (extract) was then cleaned up on a solid-phase extraction cartridge and eluted with acidified hexane. After the eluate was evaporated to dryness under nitrogen at 55 degrees C, the residue was reconstituted in 1 mL mobile phase solution and analyzed by reversed-phase gradient chromatography with UV detection at 285 nm. The method was then applied in a survey study of slaughter animals to determine whether flunixin is being used in an off-label manner for veal and beef production in Canada.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.655
Threshold uncertainty score0.268

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.017
GPT teacher head0.229
Teacher spread0.212 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it