Genotyping of Campylobacter isolates from swine, poultry and humans in Canada.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Direct epidemiological evidence indicating that pork meat can be a source of campylobacteriosis in human are missing, while it is widely accepted for poultry products. A total of I 01 Campylobacter strains isolated from slaughtered swines, 195 strains isolated from broilers as well as 24 human Campylobacter strains from ill patients were included in this study. The genetic characterization of isolates was performed by pulse-field gel electrophoresis (PFGE). Macrorestrictions profiles were obtained with by digestion of DNA withKpni. The combination of the 72 PFGE swine patterns with the PFGE human patterns gave no genetic link between strains while 20 % of human isolates were genetically related to poultry isolates. Since C. jejuni was mainly recovered from human and poultry while swine harbored C. coli, the role of swine in the transmission of Campylobacter to human population by meat consumption remain uncertain.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".