MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W107229705 · doi:10.51644/gcnn7973

The Other Side of Jabbok

2014· article· en· W107229705 on OpenAlexaff
Mark W. Harris

Bibliographic record

VenueConsensus · 2014
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicArchaeology and Historical Studies
Canadian institutionsWilfrid Laurier University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsNothingSuspectHappeningCharacter (mathematics)Reading (process)Action (physics)Active listeningPhilosophyAestheticsHistoryLiteratureSociologyArtEpistemologyArt historyLinguistics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

his is Jacob’s story. That is really where we need to begin, by acknowledging that this familiar story of the wrestling at the Jabbok is all about Jacob. He is the focus, the character standing at center stage. But even as we listen to this reading, we cannot assume that Jacob’s is the only story, or even the only character in this story who is worth pondering. In Scripture as in life, those in the spotlight can so capture our attention that we completely overlook what is happening on the edges or in the margins. In doing so, we inadvertently neglect those stories that are suggested but left untold. Maybe we assume they have nothing to say or nothing of importance worth listening to. But sometime, just sometimes, if we can turn our attention beyond the obvious, we may see, hear, and find ourselves challenged and surprised in ways we never imagined. Indeed, we might even find God to be present and working in the margins, places where we least expect God to be found! What would happen if we looked, in this story, where we did not expect the action to be? This is Jacob’s story, after all, and I suspect that we have always heard it that way. But have you ever wondered about the view of the other side of the Jabbok? What was the story of those whom this text does not even acknowledge by giving them names, but who were sent across the stream, so that Jacob could be left alone in his wrestling? While today’s text – in its single-minded focus on Jacob - does not name these characters, we know who they were… or at least some of them. Here, on the other side of the Jabbok was Rachel, with whom a younger Jacob had been so utterly smitten that he worked for seven years to win her hand in marriage, only to discover that Laben, his devious father-in-law, had slipped Rachel’s older sister, Leah, into the marriage bed. As a result, Jacob had to work still another seven years to earn Rachel as his bride. Here, on the other side of the Jabbok was Rachel’s son, Joseph, who was the apple of his father’s eye, who would be sold into slavery by his jealous brothers, and who would end up in Pharaoh’s household in Egypt. Here, on the other side of the Jabbok was Leah (the older sister) and her children, Ruben, Simeon, Levi, Judah, Issachar, Zebulun, and Dinah. Here, on the other side of the Jabbok was Rachel’s handmaid, Bilhah, whom Rachel had given to Jacob when her own womb was barren, and the sons she bore, Dan and Naphtali. Here, on the other side of the Jabbok was Leah’s handmaid, Zilpah, who had born Gad and Asher to Jacob as well. So here, on the other side of the Jabbok, were Jacob’s wives, maids, and children, as well as servants, herdsmen, and their families that are not even numbered. And so, while the text barely mentions any of these, in its effort to tell Jacob’s story, they were all there. They, too were heirs of the promise, the future of God’s chosen people, and we can be certain that they had their own stories to tell. T

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.963
Threshold uncertainty score0.423

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.034
GPT teacher head0.222
Teacher spread0.188 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2014
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueConsensusSame topicArchaeology and Historical StudiesFrench-language works237,207