MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W108328133 · doi:10.1103/physrevb.70.014504

Single-quasiparticle stability and quasiparticle-pair decay in<mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">YBa</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mn>2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:msub><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Cu</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mn>3</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mn>6.5</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math>

2004· article· lv· W108328133 on OpenAlexaff
Nuh Gedik, P. A. Blake, R. Spitzer, J. Orenstein, Ruixing Liang, D. A. Bonn, W. N. Hardy

Bibliographic record

VenuePhysical Review B · 2004
Typearticle
Languagelv
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicPhysics of Superconductivity and Magnetism
Canadian institutionsUniversity of British Columbia
Fundersnot available
KeywordsQuasiparticlePhysicsBrillouin zoneCondensed matter physicsAtomic physicsPhononSuperconductivity

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

We report results and analysis of time-resolved photoinduced reflectivity experiments on the cuprate superconductor ${\mathrm{YBa}}_{2}{\mathrm{Cu}}_{3}{\mathrm{O}}_{6.5}$. The sample, which has ${T}_{c}=45\phantom{\rule{0.3em}{0ex}}\mathrm{K}$, was characterized by a high degree of purity and Ortho II ordering. The change in reflectivity $\ensuremath{\Delta}R$ was induced and probed using pulses of $100$ femtosecond duration and photon energy $1.55\phantom{\rule{0.3em}{0ex}}\mathrm{eV}$ from a $\mathrm{Ti}$:Sapphire laser. We provide a detailed picture of the decay rate $\ensuremath{\gamma}$ of $\ensuremath{\Delta}R$ as a function of temperature $T$ and pump intensity $I$. At low $T$, $\ensuremath{\gamma}$ decreases linearly with decreasing $I$, extrapolating to nearly zero in the limit that $I$ tends to zero. At higher temperature $\ensuremath{\gamma}$ has the same linear dependence, but with nonzero limit as $I\ensuremath{\rightarrow}0$. In the interpretation of these results we assume that $\ensuremath{\Delta}R$ is proportional to the nonequilibrium quasiparticle density created by the laser. From an analysis of the $\ensuremath{\gamma}$ vs $I$ we estimate $\ensuremath{\beta}$, the coefficient of proportionality relating the quasiparticle decay rate to the density. The intercept of $\ensuremath{\gamma}$ vs $I$ yields the thermal equilibrium quasiparticle decay rate. In a discussion section, we argue that the quasiparticles induced by the laser occupy primarily states near the antinodal regions of the Brillouin zone. We explain the divergence of the lifetime of these particles as $T$ and $I$ both tend to zero as a consequence of momentum and energy conservation in electron-electron scattering. Next, we discuss the significance of the measured value of $\ensuremath{\beta}$, which is $\ensuremath{\approx}0.1\phantom{\rule{0.3em}{0ex}}{\mathrm{cm}}^{2}\phantom{\rule{0.3em}{0ex}}{\mathrm{s}}^{\ensuremath{-}1}$ . We point out that the natural unit for $\ensuremath{\beta}$ in a two-dimensional superconductor is $\ensuremath{\hbar}∕{m}^{*}$, and define a dimensionless constant $C$ such that $\ensuremath{\beta}\ensuremath{\equiv}C\ensuremath{\hbar}∕{m}^{*}$. If the decay process is one in which quasiparticles return to the condensate with emission of a phonon, then $C$ is a measure of the electron-phonon interaction. Alternatively, expressing the marginal Fermi liquid scattering in the normal state in terms of an effective $\ensuremath{\beta}$ implies $C=1∕\ensuremath{\pi}$, which is in excellent agreement with the experimentally determined value in the superconducting state.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.006
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies, Scholarly communication, Open science, Research integrity, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies, Research integrity, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.938
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0060.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0030.006
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.006
Bibliometrics0.0010.004
Science and technology studies0.0040.005
Scholarly communication0.0040.007
Open science0.0060.006
Research integrity0.0040.005
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.8830.006

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.022
GPT teacher head0.251
Teacher spread0.228 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.

Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations99
Published2004
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuePhysical Review BSame topicPhysics of Superconductivity and MagnetismFrench-language works237,207