Air and Ground Surface Temperature Relations in a Mountainous Basin, Wolf Creek, Yukon Territory
Bibliographic record
Abstract
It has been theorized that psychopaths have a fundamental deficit with respect to emotions (Cleckley, 1941). This study compares psychopaths with control subjects (Hare, 1991) in terms of their physiological and subjective responses to video clips depicting different emotions: joy, fear, anger, sadness, and disgust. Physiological measures assessed cardiovascular, respiratory, electrodermal, electromyographic responding, as well as skin temperature. Subjective measures assessed bodily sensations and subjective emotional appraisal. The principal physiological difference was a lower blood pressure among psychopaths before and during emotional stimulation. Thus, while psychopaths's autonomic base-line may be generally hyporeactive, they do not seem to have any emotion-specific physiological deficit. Globally, the results suggested no specific psychophysiological deficits among psychopaths in a context using daily emotions. Subjective measures also revealed that, compared to control subjects, psychopaths reported less intense bodily sensations during emotional stimulation. There was no difference between the two groups in terms of emotional appraisal.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".