MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W108933815

Report of Gnathophausia ingens (Dohrn, 1870) from bathypelagic region of Bay of Bengal, corroborated by DNA barcoding and 18S rRNA gene sequencing

2014· article· en· W108933815 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Gunalan Balakrishnan, Chinnamani Prasannakumar

Bibliographic record

VenueIndian Journal of Fisheries · 2014
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEarth and Planetary Sciences
TopicMarine Biology and Ecology Research
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsBathyal zoneBiologyBayDNA barcodingBENGALPhylogenetic treePhylogeneticsGene16S ribosomal RNAZoologyEvolutionary biologyGeneticsEcologyGeography
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Gnathophausia ingens is a cosmopolitan bathypelagic large mysid belonging to the family Gnathophausiidae of the order Lophogastrida. Occurrence of this species in Bay of Bengal is reported in this paper. DNA barcodes as well as18S rRNA gene sequences were used to confirm the identity and to delineate the phylogeny of G. ingens . The mitochondrial CO1 sequence shared 97% similarity with G. ingens previously sequenced from deepsea waters of Canada. Phylogram precisely clustered G. ingens isolated from Bay of Bengal with the same species sequenced from Gulf of Mexico proving the similarity shared in DNA sequences despite the geographical distance. The sequences produced in this study will act as benchmark for precise identification of G. ingens from Indian waters.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.020
Threshold uncertainty score0.040

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0020.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.021
GPT teacher head0.218
Teacher spread0.197 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2014
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueIndian Journal of FisheriesSame topicMarine Biology and Ecology ResearchFrench-language works237,207