MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W109190487

Homebuilders Choice Behaviour analysis/Une Analyse Du Comportement Des Constructeurs Immobiliers Dans Leur Choix

2008· article· fr· W109190487 on OpenAlexvenueaboutno aff
Abolfazl Mohammadian, Murtaza Haider, Pavlos Kanaroglou

Bibliographic record

VenueCanadian Journal of Regional Science · 2008
Typearticle
Languagefr
FieldEconomics, Econometrics and Finance
TopicHousing Market and Economics
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMultinomial logistic regressionDiscrete choiceSpatial analysisMixed logitEconometricsWelfare economicsHumanitiesGeographyEconomicsMathematicsLogistic regressionStatisticsArt
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Research in housing supply is scarce. Even scarcer is the research on the location and housing-type choices of homebuilders. The academic literature is almost silent on the questions of what influences the location and housing type choices of homebuilders. Similarly, a small body of literature has addressed spatial autocorrelation in discrete choice models. The spatial homogeneity depicted by the typical cookie-cutter architecture of urban and suburban dwellings suggests the presence of spatial autocorrelation. However, empirical studies of the determinants of homebuilders' product type choices have completely ignored the presence of spatial correlation. This paper presents the derivation and development of a random parameter discrete choice model that accounts for spatial correlation in choice behaviour. A mixed spatial multinomial logit model is formulated that incorporates spatial dependencies to predict housing-type choices of new homebuilders. The results of the model suggest that housing-type choice of a homebuilder is influenced by other projects in adjacent zones, resulting in a spatially correlated choice behaviour. Heterogeneity effects were also found to be important in this model. The mixed spatial multinomial logit model offers a substantial improvement, in terms of model fit, over the multinomial logit and standard spatial logit models. Resume Il existe tres peu de recherche au sujet de l'offre immobiliere et encore moins sur le choix de la localisation et type de logements que les entrepreneurs construisent. De la meme facon, il n'y a que peu de recherche qui se penche sur la question de l'autocorrelation spatiale dans l'analyse des choix discrets. Par contre, l'homogeneite spatiale des banlieues suggere l'existence d'une autocorrelation spatiale. Les etudes empiriques des choix et comportements des entrepreneurs ignorent completement l'autocorrelation spatiale. L'article presente les choix de types de logements que les entrepreneurs construisent en tenant compte des parametres de dependance spatiale et d'heterogeneite en matiere de gouts. Cet article demontre et developpe un modele de choix discret avec des parametres aleatoires qui incorpore l'autocorrelation spatiale. Ces dernieres annees, un nombre limite de recherches a essaye d'analyser les dependances spatiales et temporales des decision-makers et les alternatives. Alors que les dependances temporales sont souvent considerees dans les modeles dynamiques, peu de recherche incorpore les dependances spatiales dans les variables dependantes qualitatives et les modeles de choix discret. L'idee de base presentee dans cet article est que les entrepreneurs qui construisent, influencent le choix de types de logement des autres entrepreneurs qui peuvent choisir de construire de nouveaux logements dans un espace proche, resultant en un choix lie au comportement dans l'espace. Les donnees sur les constructions de nouveaux types de logement et ses determinants ont ete compilees a partir de diverses sources. La base de donnees de construction de logement consiste en des nouveaux developpements de logements en incorporant le type, la localisation et le prix de nouveaux logements construits entre janvier 1997 et avril 2001 dans la grande region metropolitaine de Toronto (Greater Toronto Area, GTA). La base de donnees integre tous les nouveaux types de developpement de logements ayant un minimum de dix nouvelles unites de logement. L'echantillon final utilise dans cette etude consiste en 1384 nouveaux projets de developpement pour lesquels toutes les variables requises etaient disponibles. Chaque projet represente la decision des entrepreneurs de construire un type particulier d'unite de logement, incluant single detached houses, semi-detached (SD) houses, projets d'appartements, et autres developpements de type low riset (townhouses, row houses). Les 1384 projets de logement incluent la construction de 113000 nouvelles unites de logement. …

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.987
Threshold uncertainty score0.030

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0090.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.041
GPT teacher head0.226
Teacher spread0.185 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations3
Published2008
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCanadian Journal of Regional ScienceSame topicHousing Market and EconomicsFrench-language works237,207