MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W10938704

REHABILITATION OF THE LITTLE CURRENT SWING BRIDGE HIGHWAY 6 AT MANITAOULIN ISLAND, ONTARIO

2002· article· en· W10938704 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
John Low

Bibliographic record

VenueLa radiologia medica · 2002
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicStructural Engineering and Vibration Analysis
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsBridge (graph theory)EngineeringSwingForensic engineeringMainlandClutchCivil engineeringMechanical engineeringArchaeologyGeography
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The Algoma Eastern Railway swing bridge at Little Current was constructed in 1913 part of a 140 km rail link from Sudbury to Little Current linking Manitoulin Island to mainland Ontario, the only land link between Manitoulin and the mainland. In 1999, a contractor was retained to design the modernization and automation of the operation of the 86 year old structure because of concerns about its operational reliability. Since the bridge was listed in the Ontario Heritage Bridge program, the operation, outward appearance and color had to be maintained. This paper describes the sophisticated design that allowed complete operation of the bridge by the push button. Also discussed is the mechanical rehabilitation that replaced the main and wedge drive systems, and a state of the art computer control that replaces the manual levers and clutches that originally controlled the extensive system of shafts and gears transmitting power to the main ring gear and end wedges. The old gasoline drive engines have been replaced with electric motors. Today the bridge operates as smooth glass.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.230
Threshold uncertainty score0.463

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0080.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0660.008

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.011
GPT teacher head0.199
Teacher spread0.188 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2002
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueLa radiologia medicaSame topicStructural Engineering and Vibration AnalysisFrench-language works237,207